Revocation of a will by marriage – Lattimer v Karamanoli

Lattimer v Karamanoli [2023] EWHC 1524 (Ch)

Evi Kalodiki, a former surgeon, was terminally ill with cancer when she decided to marry her partner, Dr Lattimer.

Evi had asked her friend to arrange a Greek Orthodox ceremony at the chapel in her hospice. She also asked him to help draft her will; the first and only will she ever drafted. Both the will drafting and religious ceremony took place on 27 December 2018, with the legal marriage taking place the next day. Sadly, Evi then died a few days later on 31 December 2018.

The unusually short timeframe over which these key events occurred would beg the question: surely the will contemplated the marriage? The case however progressed to the High Court where the decision proved not so simple.

Evi had a large estate, worth approximately £10million in assets (£3million of which were based in England). Under the disputed will, this estate would be divided six ways. If the will were revoked however, the entirety of her English estate would pass under the rules of intestacy to Dr Lattimer (the Claimant). Evi’s sister (the Defendant), who stood to benefit from the will, sought to defend Dr Lattimer’s claim that the will had been revoked.

Despite only being drafted the day before, Evi’s will, perhaps unusually, made no mention of the upcoming marriage.

In bringing a claim for summary judgment, Dr Lattimer sought to establish that the marriage revoked the will, that Evi’s sister had no real prospect of successfully defending this claim and that there was no other compelling reason why the case should proceed to a full trial.

In her defence, Evi’s sister raised a number of points, the key one being that the will failed to reflect Evi’s intentions – i.e. that the will was plainly intended to survive the marriage despite no express clause being included to this effect, as would be the case had it been professionally drafted. The phrase “my last and only will” could potentially be interpreted to hold this effect. She also raised issues in relation to Evi’s capacity to marry.

Key takeaways

What is evident from this case is the court’s power of interpretation, which may be more likely to be exercised in unorthodox circumstances such as these where the will was drafted both by a layperson and so close to the marriage and death. It also however demonstrates the legal power of marriage, as ultimately the court’s hands may be tied in circumstances where there is less room for interpretation.

In recent years, the Law Commission has been considering the overarching position that a will is revoked by marriage, with a further consultation due to take place this autumn. We remain interested to hear the outcome of this consultation, and the full trial.

We would always recommend to get a will professionally drafted. For further information on will drafting, please get in touch with our Succession & Tax team. If you are potentially looking to contend or defend a will, please get in touch with Thomas Middlehurst in our Contentious Trusts & Estates team.